Sunday, September 19, 2010

The Duck Test #4

The duck test is a humorous term for a form of inductive reasoning. It can be explained this way:  "If a bird looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck".

The duck test implies that a person can figure out the true nature of an unknown subject by observing the subject's readily identifiable traits. It is sometimes used to counter difficult arguments when dealing with something that is not what it actually appears to be.

Today, we are going to apply two duck tests to Calvinism, one from a worldly perspective, and the other from a Christ-centered perspective. More specifically, we are going to look at John Calvin since his teachings are the foundation of what Calvinists believe. So, who is John Calvin?

John Calvin
John Calvin was a famous theologian, writer, and pastor. (1509-1564) Along with Martin Luther in Germany, Calvin is considered to be one of the most influential forces of the Protestant Reformation. His commentaries and his work,  Institutes of the Christian Religion, have become a major influence on Christian theology and the "source" of what Calvinists believe today. In Geneva, Calvin attracted other Protestant refugees, and, over time, made that city a major force in the spread of Reformed theology.

Duck Test (world centered)
From the very short historical summary referenced above, it would be easy to conclude that Calvin was a great thinker (quack), a great writer (quack), a great religous leader (quack), a great reformer(quack), and the list goes on (quack, quack quack).  When applying the duck test to Calvin from a world-centered perspective, I think many of us would agree that he was indeed a very great man who made some very important contributions to history.

But since this is a Christian blog, I would like to apply the duck test from a Christ-centered perspective to see if Calvin measures up to what God would define as great. Before doing this, let's review another side of Calvin that is usually not discussed in Calvinist church groups.

John Calvin
John Calvin was known as a cruel, murderous, tyrant who considered himself to be the "Pope of Geneva". Calvin lacked love, compassion, patience, and tolerance for those who did not agree with his Institutes. Criticism of Calvin's Institutes was considered heresy, and it resulted in a sentence of death by burning at the stake.

Duck Test (Christ centered)
From this historical summary, most Christians would agree that Calvin was anything but great. During Calvin's  "five year reign of terror" (quack), he was responsible for sentencing 58 people to death (quack), and exiling 76 others because they disagreed with him on spiritual matters (quack). Furthermore, he held onto some of his Catholic beliefs, such as infant baptism (quack), and he placed his own writings above the Bible (quack). Moreover, Calvin's belief structure and writings were strongly influenced by the work of Augustine, a philosopher and theologian, who, for nine years, was part of a Persian cult rooted in gnoticsm called Manichaeism before he converted to Catholicism (quack!quack!quack!). Based upon these observances, if we apply the duck test from a Christ-centered perspective, I think most of us would conclude that John Calvin was far from being a great man, let alone a devoted Christ follower.

It is interesting to note that our duck test conclusions of John Calvin are quite different depending on what perspective we are using (Christ-centered vs. world-centered). The reason this is so important to point out is because Calvinists will often make world-centered arguments stating John Calvin was a great man who made remarkable contributions to the advancement of Western  Christianity (which is true). They will also point out how many prestigous Christian leaders agree with John Calvin, such as Charles Spurgeon, Jonathan Edwards, John Piper, and R.C. Sproul (also true). After gaining some credibility, the Calvinist will take you down a logical path and proclaim that Calvinism is true because of these world-centered perspectives. Then, they will make claims that their beliefs are based on the Bible (which is false). Don't be fooled, Calvinism is squarely based on the teachings of John Calvin, who in turn based his writings on the work of Augustine.

When questions about John Calvin's dark side come up, Calvinists will argue that violence was acceptable during the time that Calvin lived, therefore excusing all the evil and bloodshed caused by Calvin and his followers. If we were using a world-centered perspective, the Calvinists would have a very strong argument; however, we need to use a Christ-centered perspective and the Bible as our authority. Regardless of the times, there is no excuse or justification for Calvin's behavior. The Bible and history gives us numerous examples of God's people yielding to God, and sometimes even giving their own lives as a selfless sacrifice to God. When comparing the two perspectives, the Calvinist position falls apart and we see Calvinism for what it really is - a man-made,  world-centered philosophy.

When these obvious, Christ-centered truths are pointed out to a Calvinist, an attempt will be made to defend the Calvinist position with arguments such as, "we do not follow Calvin, we follow the Bible". However, you can no more seperate Calvinism from John Calvin, than you can seperate Mormonism from Joseph Smith, or Nazism from Adolph Hitler.

It is offensive, in view of the Christ-centered duck test, to base one's spriritual beliefs on John Calvin and call it Christian. How can there be any question that this evil man was like Christ?  Please, I encourage you to do your own research on John Calvin, and to conduct your own duck test based on the truths found in the Bible and in history.  Discover for yourself whether or not the information I am writing is true.

Remember: If a bird looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck!

12 comments:

  1. Spurgeon said that we need to go back to the Calvinism of John Calvin. As much as I respect Charles Haddon Spurgeon (knowing, too, that he was only a man), I must disagree with that grand old warrior in this matter. I say we need to go far beyond that. Calvin himself went back as far as Augustine, but that, too, is not nearly far enough. In fact, depending on the very undependable Augustine was one of Calvin’s chief errors. We don’t need to go back to Calvin or Augustine. We need to go all the way back to “the faith once delivered to the saints” as it is perfectly and sufficiently recorded in the Scriptures! That is where our systematic theology must start...Dave Cloud

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sola Scriptura and Regeneration
    According to Scripture, regeneration does not take place before belief. Consider the following passages:


    John 3:15,16
    That whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have eternal life.

    For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.



    Ephesians 1:13 In whom ye also trusted, after that ye heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation: in whom also after that ye believed, ye were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise.



    Acts 16:30,31-And brought them out, and said, Sirs, what must I do to be saved? And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house.



    Why do Calvinists insist that the new birth (regeneration) takes place before belief? Some, such as Authur Pink, rush to 2 Thess. 2:13-God hath from the beginning chosen you to salvation through sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth. The only problem is this- that verse is not giving the order of salvation. It is clear by the previous passages what the order is.



    There are sincere Calvinists that use the phrase “Sola Scriptura” and attempt to live by it. Yet when is comes down to being confronted with clear passages of Scripture, they run to respected authors such as John Piper, John MacArthur, Authur Pink, and John Calvin to quote their works. Some run to confessions and creeds to back up the theory of Calvinism. The question I ask is this, “What happened to “Sola Scriptura?” If they really lived the motto, there would be no question about the order of regeneration and belief. Who is the final authority? Is it God, or man?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I cannot imagine a more ready instrument in the hands of Satan for the ruin of souls than a minister who tells sinners that it is not their duty to repent of their sins or to believe in Christ, and who has the arrogance to call himself a gospel minister, while he teaches that God hates some men infinitely and unchangeably for no reason whatsoever but simple because he chooses to do so. - New Park Street Pulpit - Vol 6, 28-29 Spuergeon

    ReplyDelete
  4. Calvinism goes beyond biblical statements in an attempt to systematize the mysteries of God. John Calvin was a philosopher by training; his Institutes are extremely philosophical. It was first written when Calvin was young and only new converted to Protestantism, when his mind was still filled with the philosophy that he had studied as a Catholic priest.

    True theology is simply believing and rightly interpreting the Bible, but God warns against philosophy and about leaving the simplicity of Christ (Col. 2:8; 2 Cor. 11:3).

    Philosophy is to use the human intellect and logic in an attempt to come to the truth apart from divine revelation. In the case of Calvinism, the problem is that he goes beyond the actual statements of Scripture and creates doctrine by human reasoning.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Reformedyoungman replied to Defending The Faith’s comment: Jul 17, 2009 ReplyIf we believe that we were truly "dead in our trespasses and sins" before Christ saved us, since "while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us", then we have to look at these passages a different way. For example, the Acts 16:30-31 passage above. Reformedyoungman wrote: Jul 17, 2009 ReplyIf we believe that we were truly "dead in our trespasses and sins" before Christ saved us, since "while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us", then we have to look at these passages a different way. For example, the Acts 16:30-31 passage above. Did this jailer, who as an unbeliever is spiritually dead, suddenly come to spiritual life on his own, or did he hear the calling of the Savior? If Jesus has only passed by Lazerus' tomb or stood outside silently, would Lazerus ever have seen Him and thus come to life? It was his Savior's calling his name that brought Him back to life. Likewise, as spritually dead sinners, no one can come to know Jesus unless He first calls them. Romans 3 tells us the no one can ANY good on their own. What more good is there than surrendering to Christ? I firmly believe that man has a responsibility to respond to the gospel of Christ, yet he cannot do it with our Christ's power working through him. Jesus is the "author and perfector of your faith". He is the author-the originator, the creater, the soveriegn hand of our faith. He is the perfector-Christ is responsible for our faith coming to full maturity. He is responsible for holding our faith to Him, which He says cannot be taken away in John 6. In other words, Christ is the means by and the ends to which we are saved. I also passionately believe in evangilism and missions and have dedicated much of my time, resources and comfort to that cause. It is the way God has ordained that His peope hear His name.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Reformedyoungman (RYM) brings up some very good points. Also, Thanks for your post, and glory to God for your passion and commitment to missions and evangelism.

    I am sorry for taking so long to respond. I have been very busy with kids,work and a bunch of other things, so I have not been able to contribute that much to the DTF Blog; however, I will make it a point to respond to your points over the weekend.

    Again, you have made some very good points. I look forward to a Biblical dialogue with you on this topic going forward.

    Thank You ~ DTF

    ReplyDelete
  7. RYM...I am sorry it has taken this long for me to finally respond. The kids are sleeping, and I finally have some time to respond. Thank you for your patience and your comments.

    As mentioned before, you bring up some excellent points. I agree with you that Christ "is the means and ends to which we are saved". I Just believe that God is the means and ends for "all" men, not just the chosen few that Calvinists want us to believe.

    Also, the Bible is filled with literary language that has to be put into its proper context. For example, God is referred to as the "bread of life" (John 6:35), is God saying he is a loaf of bread? or is God saying something else? We must always put God's Word into its proper context. There are many Calvinists who confuse physical death with spiritual death, and by doing so, they change the entire meaning and application of what the Bible is trying to say. More on this later...

    Calvinists argue that if man can somehow choose to follow God, then man is somehow responsible for his own salvation. The essence of God's love is Choice. Otherwise, we would be be nothing more than robots carrying out the wishes of the one who programmed us (what kind of love is that?). If you get the chance, please read one of my earlier blogs titled "The Stepford Wives". For the record, man can not save himself. God is our Savior, and it is in Him, and in Him alone I put my trust in. More on this later...

    I have to run, but I hope to discuss these things with you later...All the best,

    -DTF

    ReplyDelete
  8. Imagine that there is a ten story building on fire. . .The fire department is called and the fire chief gives his men the following orders. "I want you to save only the people on the even numbered floors, and anyone who is on the odd numbered floors do not save". The fire chief has enough resources to save everyone in the building, but for some unknown reason he decides that only those on the even # floors are to be saved. (He could have just as easily decided to save those on the odd # floors and let those on the even # floors perish).
    As strange as the above story sounds, this is exactly how the "maze" of Calvinism works. In the analogy, God is the fire chief. He makes an arbitrary decision to save - or not save - the people in the building on an unconditional basis. There is no difference between the people on the even # floors or the odd # floors (all the people, according to Calvinism, are dead anyway); thus, the orders are given and only those on the even # floors are saved from the fire, while those on the odd # floors perish in the flames.
    Regarding the people who live on the even # floors. They have no choice in the matter. They have to accept the offer to be saved from the flames. The only thing that matters is the fact that they lived on an even # floor; whereas, those living on an odd # floor are never given the opportunity to be saved. The fire chief's decision to save only the people on even # floors, was a decision to dam the people on the odd # numbered floors.
    in the real world, if the above scenario actually happened, the fire chief would be fired and likely be charged with murder. Yet, Calvinists want us to believe that God works in the manner described in the story above. Even more insulting, Calvinists want us to believe that the actions (and inactions) of the fire chief is called "love". What kind of love are they referring to?
    The god of Calvinism is an arbitrary autocrat who arranged the fall of human beings and then sends some of them to eternal punishment for being and doing precisely what He predestined them to be and do. ..beings whose sole purpose for existence is as Calvin put it "to glorify God by their destruction". The good news is that the god of Calvinism does not exist. The bad news, or sad news, is that so many people (Calvinists) believe in and worship this god.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Response to RYM (part 1)

    To RYM (continued)

    As mentioned earlier, I believe Calvinism confuses physical death and spiritual death and as a result, they change the entire meaning of what the scriptures say on this important subject. There are many Calvinists who claim that because man is dead he can not choose good; thus, Calvinists will point out the state of man is like a corpse in a cemetery unable to choose good or respond to the Gospel; however, if you follow the argument to its logical conclusion, if man is dead, then he can't do evil or reject the Gospel either. The Bible constantly repeats that the unsaved, who are spiritually dead, should "believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and they will be saved".

    Regarding your point about Lazarus, as found in John Chapter 11, it is true that he didn't have to believe on the Lord Jesus to be raised physically... He didn't even have to see, hear or think anything. The command from the Lord Jesus was enough to impart physical life back into Lazarus. But to say this illustrates spiritual life or salvation and that there is nothing that an unsaved person needs to do is not consistent with the teachings of the Bible.

    "Let's say that an unbeliever at your work came up to you (knowing that you were a Christian) and said 'I've been thinking quite a bit lately about my life, and have even started reading parts of the Bible and was wondering what I need to do to receive salvation?' Would you say to that person that there is nothing what so ever that he can do because like Lazarus he is dead in his sins, and can't even believe or respond to Jesus... and that unless Jesus comes/calls/regenerates him, he will just remain dead? I hope not. And I don't think you actually would do this. I'm sure you would tell him what the Bible says concerning salvation and that he should believe in the Lord Jesus Christ alone for his salvation".
    "I think a better illustration of salvation in the gospel of John is the one that Jesus Himself used. It is in John 3:14-15. 'Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up, that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.' It is taken of course from Numbers 21:7-9 where Israel had sinned and had been as a judgment from God, they had been bitten by snakes. He then commanded them to look to a bronze snake raised up on a pole and everyone who looked at the snake was healed! The illustration is very apt. All of humanity are sinners and have been bitten by that venomous snake. But God has provided a way of escape and it is by looking, in faith, to the one who was made sin for us (the bronze snake raised up on the pole) so that, in the words of Jesus, 'everyone who believes in Him may have eternal life!' That's the promise of Jesus and that is what we should be telling the unsaved".

    When it comes to the use of "death" in the Bible, we have to make sure that we understand it its proper context. There is so much more to say, and I hope to add more when time permits.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Response to RYM (part 2)

    Why Must Man Be Saved
    The Bible leaves no doubt about our condition. While we set our standards of right and wrong by society's values, God's standard is His own holiness. How do we measure up? "All have sinned and come short of the glory of God" (Romans 3:23). It is only fair that God demands holiness; that is how He first created mankind. We have all rebelled against Him as individuals, and our ways are not His ways.
    Our pathway away from God has brought its consequences. "The wages of sin is death" (Romans 6:23a). The Bible compares sin to a cruel slave master. There is no mercy in suffering, no freedom from bondage, no lasting joy, no hope for the future. Most frightening is the final consequence of sin. The Bible warns that without God's salvation, death is the doorway to eternal punishment (Hebrews 9:27).
    It is from this death that we need to be saved. From our own sin. From its bondage. From its consequences. "How shall we escape if we neglect so great salvation?" (Hebrews 2:3).
    God is holy and God is love. His holiness demands that our sin be punished in full. His love provides a way for us to be saved from this punishment. How is this possible? The answer is found in John 3:16 "For God so loved the world that He gave His one and only Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish but have eternal life".God's plan of salvation brings us into the good of Christ's suffering, death, and victory.
    "For when we were yet without strength, in due time, Christ died for the ungodly" (Romans 5:6). "
    "For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him." (John 3:17).
    "For the Son of man is come to save that which was lost." Matthew 18:11
    "For the Son of man is not come to destroy men's lives, but to save them." Luke 9:56

    ReplyDelete
  11. Response to RYM (part 3)

    What Must One "Do" to Be Saved?
    One of my favorite verses in the Bible is Ephesians 2:8-9 which says "For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this not from yourselves, it is the gift of God— not by works, so that no one can boast". Another favorite is Galatians 2:21 which says " I do not set aside the grace of God, for if righteousness could be gained through the law, Christ died for nothing! Salvation is a gift that can not be earned. We just have to believe (accept it) pure and simple.
    When it comes to the gift described in Ephesians, many Calvinists have a difficult time of accepting the idea a person can choose to accept or reject God's gift. Because if a person is given a choice to believe and put their trust in Christ then salvation would depend on their own works which Calvinists believe gives a person the power over their own salvation, which in turn becomes a work and ultimately detracts from the sovereignty of God; thus, Calvinists claim the gift described in Ephesians is not salvation, but rather faith. The subtle change from salvation to faith changes the entire meaning of what the gift mentioned in Ephesians represents. This change is necessary to support the teachings of John Calvin and what Calvinists believe.
    The basic problem for the Calvinist is a failure to see that God could sovereignly give a person the power of genuine choice. … Giving a person the power to make a choice need not diminish God’s control over His universe. Being omnipotent and omniscient, God can so arrange circumstances as to keep a person’s rebellion from interfering with His purposes. In fact, God can and even does use a person’s free will to help fulfill His own plans and thus be even more glorified.
    Furthermore, Calvinists have a difficult time accepting the idea that a person must put forth any effort in order to receive God's gift of salvation. . The idea is since God’s grace cannot be earned or merited, then anyone who claims that human effort is involved in its acceptance of the gift is in error. Clearly, though, many scriptures indicate that man’s efforts are not always categorized as works of merit.
    To help illustrate this point, consider the following scenarios: If a friend wanted to give you $1,000,000, but said that in order to receive the million dollars you had to pick up a check at his house, take it to the bank, sign it, and cash it. Would any rational person conclude that this gift was earned? Of course not. Even though some effort was exerted to receive the gift, the effort was not a work of merit.
    Similarly, consider a young boy who is on the verge of drowning in the middle of a small lake. If a man heard his cries, and then proceeded to save the boy by running to the edge of the lake, inflating an inner tube, tying some rope around it, and throwing it out to the young boy who was struggling to stay afloat, would any witness to this event describe the young boy as “saving himself” (or “earning” his rescue) because he had to exert the energy to grab the inner tube and hold on while being pulled onto the bank by the passerby? No. A gift is still a gift even when the one receiving it must exert a certain amount of effort in order to possess it. The New Testament leaves no doubt that the grandest of all gifts (salvation through Christ—a spiritual gift that was in God’s mind “before the foundation of the world”—Ephesians 1:4; 3:11) is not the result of any kind of meritorious work on the part of man. The apostle Paul stressed this point several times in his writings.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Response to RYM (part 4)

    Unfortunately, Calvinists have come to the conclusion that there is no response needed on behalf of the individual. They teach that man, who is totally depraved, is incapable of responding to the Gospel (because he is dead); thus, in order to be saved, a person must be regenerated first, which means to be "made alive". The first problem with this view is that God does not regenerate everyone, which means if a person is not regenerated, or made alive, then he will remain forever dead and suffer the full penalty of their sin which results in eternal death, or damnation. But how can a person be guilty of their sin if they are dead? The second problem I have with Calvinist teaching on this subject is that faith is not really a condition for salvation. Rather, regeneration is a pre-condition for faith. Thus, people are spiritually dead and therefore unable to respond to God's offer of salvation unless God first regenerates them.
    The truth is, however, when it comes to the gift of salvation that God extends to the whole world (John 3:16), there is something that must be done on the part of the individual. They must receive the gift, and this is done by believing in Christ and Christ alone for thier salvation. When the jailor at Philippi, asked "Sirs, what must I do to be saved?" (Acts 16:30), notice the response from Paul and Silas, they did not say “There is nothing for you to do. ..just wait, and the gift of faith will come to you.” But instead they responded by instructing the Philippian jailor and his household to “believe on the Lord Jesus Christ” (Acts 16:31).
    John 3:16 is just one verse, but I believe it contains the essence of the Gospel message "For God so loved the world that He gave His one and only Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish but have eternal life".
    God's gift of salvation is for the whole world, it can not be earned. We just have to believe (and accept it) pure and simple!

    p.s. there is so much more to discuss...

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.